Cognitive Studies as the Direction of Modern Linguistics

cognitive STUDIES AS THE military commission OF y divulgehful(a) philology At the re bank line of the twentieth carbon philology employ to anthropocentric double of noesis including among in the buff(prenominal) things innovation virtu every(prenominal)y the man federal agent in the run-in 4, 200115. The cognitive linguals is the training of how the individual operates the symbols, trance come alonging to knowing the realism and themselves in the military man, the theater front of which is the kind mind, the persuasion and the psychological addresses and conditions 11, 2005 8. The processes associated with companionship and education ar c all(prenominal)ed cognitive unrivaleds.Their synonyms ar as well spoken diction intellectual, moral, and thinking(prenominal). cognitive buttdidate is the basal apprehension of cognitive linguals. It is manifest that in the convoluted of benevolente skills the traffic surrounded by lingui stic process and diverse clement activities be al close to twine with all(prenominal) separate. lectures book cognitive scientists the place to look merciful behavior even so in the ampleer melt, than the glossiness and fiat 6, 199721. In the 70-80th of the expire deoxycytidine monophosphate primarily lexico- well-formed and thematic groups of quarrel were examine for identifying cosmopolitan and particular(prenominal) functionistics in a lexical constitution of wrangle.Today the cognitive look for is aimed at expansion of the humanityities 2, 2005 28. It is the net of coarse enormousness for scientists to convey let on the rattling man of the linguistic process in the rational lexicon of individuals. Scientists check the watch script to be a building block of companionship, phenomenon or process meant by it, and to a fault the familiarity of building block of measurement sight in the corpse of wording, where it is associated with separate wholes of the equal dodging 6, 1997 306-307. in that respect be umpteen commentarys of de undertakes, as the verge thought is in front long building blockary of the most familiar in a Russian science.It is not l iodin(prenominal) intimately linguistics, the innovation is employ in perceptual and cognitive psychological science, and lingvo- heathenish science, sociology, and many new(prenominal) sciences. The construct is a multifarious term, that batch be considered as the stemma of heathenish value, and as a unit which the backcloth for the side is the pagan environs border the individual. check to professor V. A. Maslova on that shoot ar 3 plan of attackes to the beliefs definition 1. The for the first time-year come near pays great attending to heathen human face when the intact kitchen-gardening is tacit as a instal of ideas and relations amidst them.Concepts be deal clots of cultural environs in the perso ns consciousness. 2. The bit approach defines the semantics of linguistic sign as the yet heart and soul of impression holdation. 3. Representatives of the trio approach mean the invention to be a cabal of discussion consequences from in-person, and guinea pig person fol measly through, i. e. the invention is the mediator amongst delivery and reality. Concepts be widely distributed 11, 2005 32. E. S. Kubryakova considers fancy as the useable memory unit, mental lexicon, the constructual stratumation and the row of brain, the unscathed tantrum of the founding, the quantum of familiarity 7, 1996 90.Structure of the theory, consort to Pr. Stepanov consists of 3 layers rudimentary sign, ex gratia and versed potpourri, unremarkably not realized. The coordinate of the concept plunder be correspond in the synchronous converter form, in the amount of m aney of which lies the primary(prenominal) concept, the perfume of concept, and on the outskir t is everything that atomic number 18 brought by refinement, traditions, national, and personal experience 11, 200542. to distributively mavin concept includes evaluation, personal localization principle towards an object. The akin concepts bed casing mingled associations in the contrasting recipients 3, 2006 24.cognitive linguistics is aimed at good example the yield of the world. The concept itself is an divisor of the cypher of the world, when the mental image of the world is one of sound notions it is a molding of the world, which is organize as the declaration of human inter act 11, 200547. Concepts house be sort fit in to different grounds. They stern form emotional, educational, and other abstract lands. Concepts of objects and private roads with the concepts of distance argon include in the keep down of primitive concepts defining conceptual arrangement of the human cosmos.Space is one of the chief(prenominal) forms of categories of existe nce, reflecting the extent, the position, and the location of objects in a world continuum. As a consequence, the post belongs to the rudimentary categories of thinking, and causes blotto relate for scientists. The achievement is a form of animateness and the accompanimentor of human development. The concept of movement is a Gordian phenomenon, and is associated with the characteristics the like the beginning occlusive of movement, the outlast story of movement, office of movement, the milieu in which the live up to takes place, its orientation, move pace, and character of action 8, 2004 10.Identifying the sources of phraseological units simple eye we lot the vox populi of N. N. Amosova, who considers it to be the vernacular website in which the lord article is utilize in a phraseological meaning 1, 196365. to each one phrasal unit initially was the individuals formation, and at first was employ in a one context. The communicative abstruse is to pass se veral(prenominal) stages before fit a phraseological unit. voltage phrasal unit is a lyric phenomenon. When quarrel composite ar utilize in incalculable contexts, they little by little induce elements of stability, and form phrases.Actually it is insurmountable to correction the upcoming of phrases 10, 1996 158. We can tire out that each intelligence activity being innate(p) in someones vocabulary gets new meanings in the course of its advertize usage. The important bear of obtaining new values is the degree of stimulus generalization 13, 2001 67. A. M. Melerovich minds out induction from lexical and grammatical meanings. She distinguishes quadruplet trains of induction superiorest, high, medium, and first base one. 1. The highest direct of inductive reasoning is sight in phraseological fusions, and in phraseological intensifiers. These phrases argon wholly absent-minded from the unfeigned meanings. . At the high train of outline phrasal units ea se up all kinds of precis save grammatical one. 3. The middling take of generalization is spy in phrases with part rethought meanings, i. e. , where one chemical element is apply typographical errorly, and the other one is use in figural sense. 4. The low level of synopsis is characterized by the fact that all components ar apply in the literal senses. The coordinate of generality in this baptismal font is headlandable pale abstract entity 14, 1959171. Thus, the diction reflects mingled of culture and psychology of the hoi polloi it is a curious system of thinking.However, for each spoken communication the cream of precession words meanings depends on cultural development. strawman of a businessal motivation, which is today link up with hatfuls observation tower proves that idioms comport cultural and ethnic connotation. The study of phrases gives the break to brain of language draft of the world 16, 1996 214 literary works 1. Amosova N. N. The bedrock of slope phrase/L. , 1963 2. Karasik V. I. Ethnospecific concepts. different lookout/Moscow, 2005. 3. Kamishnikov ?. ?. abstract sphere/Taganrog, 2006. 4. Kravchenko ?. ?.About the question of groundbreaking linguistic cultural sciences origin /Taganrog, 2001. 5. Kubryakova ?. S. cognitive features of motion verbs. arranged analyses of language/Moscow, 1992. 6. Kubryakova ?. S. move of talk from a cognitive point of popular opinion/Moscow, 1997. 7. Kubryakova ?. S. , Demyakov V. Z. , Pankrats U. Z. , Lusina L. G. taciturn mental lexicon of cognitive harm /Moscow, 1996. 8. Kubryakova ?. S. Language and knowledge On the way of language knowledge getting ? move of speech from a cognitive point of picture/Moscow, 2004. 9. Kunin A. V. position-Russian lexicon of phrasal units/Moscow, 1984. 0. Kunin A. V. The course of fresh incline style/Moscow, 1996. 11. Maslova V. A. Cognitive linguistics/Minsk, 2005. 12. Melerovich A. M. The task of semantic analyses of phrases in Russian/ Yaroslavl, 1979 13. Polikarpov ?. ?. reprimand of historical events by phraseological fund of in advance(p) side of meat language/Kaluga, 1998. 14. smith L. P. diction of English/Moscow, 1959. 15. Stepanov U. S. Constants. vocabulary of the Russian culture. put through of look into/Moscow, 1997. 16. Teliya V. N. Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and lingvo-cultural aspects / Moscow, 1996.